fix: error on conflicting assertions#155
Open
lucacasonato wants to merge 1 commit intodenoland:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
Previously, if a specifier was imported more than once, with conflicting assertions, we'd only really consider the final import. This is wrong: conflicting assertions are an error in-themselves already. I think this behaviour is still wrong, because if a module is imported with incorrect assertions later in the graph after the module has already been loaded by an import with a correct assertion, no error will be raised.
Collaborator
|
Long term we should do this with #132 instead, and associate import assertion errors with each import. With per-import errors being a third kind on top of resolution errors and module slot errors. Maybe this patches some error cases, but the data modelling wrt import assertions is still in a very bad state. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, if a specifier was imported more than once, with conflicting
assertions, we'd only really consider the final import. This is wrong:
conflicting assertions are an error in-themselves already. I think this
behaviour is still wrong, because if a module is imported with incorrect
assertions later in the graph after the module has already been loaded by
an import with a correct assertion, no error will be raised.